Wine appellations were born of scandal. In France’s Third Republic, merchants sold “Bordeaux” from Algeria, “Champagne” from the Loire, and “Burgundy” made from anything but Pinot Noir.
The story of wine appellations begins in France, where the desire to protect the reputation of French wine and ensure the integrity of wine production dates back centuries.
As early as the 15th century, local authorities in regions like Bordeaux and Burgundy sought to safeguard the names and origins of their wines, laying the groundwork for what would become the world’s most influential vineyard classification system.
In response to the scandals and misrepresentations mentioned above, the French government established Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée (AOC) laws in 1935 to safeguard and regulate the quality and origin of wines.
It later extended these laws to other products, such as cheese.
This system was managed by the INAO (Institut National de l’Origine et de la Qualité), which set standards for:
For many years, it represented the top tier of French classification.
The establishment of the AOC system outlined a rigorous set of rules for winemakers, dictating everything from:
The AOC system was designed to classify wines produced in those regions according to their quality and origin, guaranteeing that every bottle bearing the AOC wine label truly reflected its specific appellation, terroir, and the high-quality wine standards that had made French wine famous.
These regimes promised authenticity and quality in a chaotic market, with the classification of wine produced under these systems assuring consumers of its origin.
The AOC classification quickly became the gold standard for wine appellations, inspiring wine-producing countries worldwide to adopt similar systems. Other countries followed suit and adopted their own equivalent of the AOC.
Italy introduced the Denominazione di Origine Controllata (DOC) to classify wines produced in regions like Tuscany and Piedmont. At the same time, Spain established the Denominación de Origen (DO) for areas such as Rioja and Catalonia.
Other countries followed suit and adopted their own equivalent of the AOC. Examples of wine appellation systems include:
American Viticultural Areas (AVA) require that at least 75% of the grapes must be sourced from the designated area to qualify for labelling. For example, a Napa Valley AVA wine must meet these requirements to be labelled as such.
Canada followed suit with the VQA Act, regulating the appellation of origin for wines produced in Ontario, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and beyond. Today, the appellation system is a cornerstone of the wine industry, with producers striving for recognition within their specific appellation—whether it’s Bordeaux, Burgundy, Champagne, or a rising region in the New World. Each region’s unique terroir, grape varieties, and winemaking traditions are enshrined in the rules and regulations that govern everything from vineyard to bottle.
The appellation concept has extended to other food products, such as cheese and charcuterie, with governing bodies in each country working to protect the reputation and authenticity of their quality products.
The enduring legacy of the Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée system is its role in shaping not only the global wine market but also the way consumers perceive and trust the origin and quality of the food and drink they enjoy. From Vin de France to Spanish wines and Italian DOC bottles, the appellation system remains a powerful force in the world of wine production and beyond.
AOC only applied within France. Its protection outside France depended on international treaties.
In an effort to harmonize and streamline regulations, the AOP was introduced in 2009 under EU law as part of a Europe-wide harmonization. AOP is recognized across all EU member states, giving stronger, uniform legal protection for producers in export markets and ensuring that wine drinkers across member countries can trust the origin and quality of the wine they purchase.
AOP designates wines produced in specific regions under strict standards (archaic rules updated from time to time under lobbying from the producer body). Other countries use equivalent terms under EU law, such as:
It is an EU-wide protected designation of origin (PDO) that covers all agricultural products.
Key Takeaway: Essentially, AOP = the European legal term; AOC = the French historical term. The appellation system is fundamentally about the origin of wine, ensuring that wines are tied to their specific geographical roots.
But a century on, those same protections now act as handcuffs. Josh Dunning, in his Word on the Grapevine piece, calls them “unreliable, inflexible and limiting hierarchies, propped up by thirsty bureaucrats and selfish beneficiaries.” The problem isn’t just bureaucracy. It’s how entrenched regulation:
Appellation rules enforce typicity—the idea that a region’s wines should taste a certain way. It sounds benign, even reassuring. But in practice, typicity is orthodoxy. Want to experiment with carbonic Pinot in Ontario? Or co-ferment Riesling and Vidal in a skin-contact style? If the panel decides it’s “atypical”, you lose certification, tax advantages, and shelf space.
Key Takeaway: This breeds homogeneity. Producers fear innovation not because consumers reject it, but because regulators will. Josh Dunning’s observation, “fear of being robbed of market share”, describes a system where conformity is safer than creativity.
Regulatory capture is subtle in wine. Large or historically prestigious producers often dominate appellation boards. They push rules that entrench their advantage:
Smaller or newer wineries struggle to gain recognition or lobby for change.
The result is a velvet-gloved cartel. Protectionism masquerades as authenticity. This isn’t hypothetical: in Ontario, non-VQA wineries pay 28% more in taxes when selling to restaurants—a punitive levy that tilts the playing field toward those who can afford compliance.
The VQA, created in the 1980s, was meant to signal quality and origin at a time when Canadian wine had a poor global reputation. Canada has two VQA systems, one in Ontario and another in British Columbia. Canadian wine regulations recognize three categories of Canadian-made or Canadian-bottled wine, each with specific labelling requirements to inform consumers about origin, volume, alcohol content, and compliance standards. Today, it imposes: Wineries under VQA regulations are subject to ongoing audits and inspections to ensure compliance.
Many craft wineries now carry 15–20 SKUs. For them, fees aren’t trivial—they’re existential. Yet opting out means forfeiting the tax advantage and prestige that restaurants and consumers expect. “Voluntary” becomes “mandatory by economics.” VQA wines in Ontario must be made from 100% Ontario-grown grapes to qualify for the appellation, meaning only wine produced and bottled in the province from 100% Ontario grapes qualifies for the appellation.
Meanwhile, VQA’s fixation on typicity marginalizes new grapes and styles at a moment when climate change is making the old norms unsustainable. Hybrid grapes, regenerative viticulture, and low-intervention methods are punished rather than celebrated. British Columbia’s VQA system was enacted into law in 2013 with the introduction of the Wines of Marked Quality Regulation. This regulation governs the labelling of bottled wines to ensure compliance with origin and quality standards.
Wine is uniquely vulnerable to shifting conditions. Rising temperatures are forcing grape varieties to move north and uphill. Disease pressures are demanding new hybrids. Younger consumers are prioritizing authenticity over orthodoxy. Yet many appellation rules freeze the past in legal amber. They prescribe which grapes may be grown, how they’re pruned, what yields are allowed, and even sugar levels or oak regimes.
Such rigidity creates fragility. When conditions change faster than regulations adapt, appellations become barriers to survival rather than guarantors of quality.
Appellation systems don’t just control production; they shape perception. The Geographical Indications (GIs) used in the European Union denote more than just the origin of a product and its unique characteristics. They influence quality perceptions.
Wine schools, critics, and sommeliers learn the hierarchy as gospel: Grand Cru > Premier Cru > Village > Generic. Consumers absorb the same cues. This educational lock-in creates price ceilings: why toil by hand for a “mere” Mâconnais when the market rewards the label, not the labour?
Thus, even if the regulations were repealed, the mental model would still linger. Hierarchies outlive the rules that created them.
Throwing out regulation entirely would invite chaos and fraud. But clinging to ossified systems invites irrelevance. The path forward is to re-imagine regulation itself. Wine offers a template for other sectors wrestling with legacy rules—from AI to food to energy.
Here’s what that future should look like:
The redundancies of wine regulation echo in other sectors:
In each case, the challenge is the same: how to protect consumers and the commons without smothering experimentation. The answer lies in adaptive regulation — rules that are transparent, modular, data-driven, and contestable.
The VQA and its global cousins began as quality shields. In many ways, they succeeded. But in an era of climate volatility, shifting consumer values, and technological possibilities, their rigidity is becoming a liability. As Josh Dunning writes, these systems “punish creativity and limit qualitative boundaries.”
The wine world has always thrived on the tension between tradition and innovation. The best producers know that terroir is not static; it’s alive. Regulation should be too.
The road to hell, as you wrote, is paved with good intentions. The road to the future must be paved with flexible frameworks, transparent data, and genuine trust — not typicity panels and rent-seeking hierarchies. If wine can lead that shift, it might once again become a bellwether of authenticity rather than an artifact of bureaucracy.
Key Takeaway: Vinerra is a registered lobbyist with some of the provincial governments in Canada. We are advocating for changes that benefit consumers first and producers second. But we are a lonely voice in a sea of lobbyists backed by the mass manufacturers of wine. Consider supporting our efforts to bring about change and transparency.
Take a look at our brand!
Fill the contact form and download it.
Are you interested in
collaborating with us?
Copyright © 2024 Vinerra Corp.
